Comparison 7. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 6: CBT+ STANDARD CARE versus STANDARD CARE ALONE (RANDOM EFFECT MODEL).

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Global state: 2. Clinically important change (no improvement)	3		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	Subtotals only
1.1 Short term	1	48	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.01 [0.61, 1.66]
1.2 Long term	2	82	Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	0.58 [0.40, 0.85]