Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;2018(12):CD007964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007964.pub2

Hu 2013.

Methods Allocation: randomised
Blinding: no blinding
Location: inpatients, China
Length of follow‐up: 24 weeks
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3)
N = 79
Sex: 44 M, 35 F
Age: mean ˜ 26.5 years, SD ˜ 1.3 years
Included: length of illness: mean ˜ 5.3 years, SD ˜ 1.5 years
Excluded: not reported
Interventions 1. CBT group*: N = 40
Content: The author did not state details on CBT.
Delivered by: six experienced psychologists
Frequency: The length of CBT was 60 minutes per time, once per week for 24 weeks.
Treatment duration: 24 weeks
2. Standard care group: N = 39
Content: Participants received risperidone with a dosage of 3 ‐ 6 mg/time. A length of four weeks was considered as one course of treatment. The intervention involves 6 courses of treatment in total.
Delivered by: not reported
Frequency: not reported
Treatment duration: 24 weeks
Outcomes Mental state: general, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, affective symptoms (PANSS scores)
Functioning: semantic influencing, mood management, continuous performance, visual memory and verbal memory (MCCB scores)
Notes *Participants in the CBT group also received the standard care intervention.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Participants were randomly assigned..." (p.17).
Comments: insufficient information about the sequence generation process to permit judgement of 'Low risk' or 'High risk'
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comments: The method of concealment was not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comments: The author did not address this information. However, participants and personnel were not likely to be blinded because participants in the treatment group received CBT, and the control group only received standard care.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comments: The method of blindness was not described.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comments: no attrition
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comments: All measured outcomes were reported.
Other bias Low risk Comments: none obvious