Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 20;2018(12):CD007964. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007964.pub2

Liu 2012.

Methods Allocation: randomised
Blinding: not addressed
Location: inpatients, China
Length of follow‐up: 6 months
Participants Diagnosis: schizophrenia (CCMD‐3)
N = 112
Sex: 68 M, 44 F
Age: mean ˜ 41.6 years, SD ˜ 3.5 years
Included: length of illness: mean ˜ 4.9 years, SD ˜ 0.5 years; achieved clinical response after one hospitalisation; at the stage of rehabilitation
Excluded: not reported
Interventions 1. CBT group*: N = 56
Content: antipsychotics, rehabilitation training, cognitive and behaviour modification, life skill training, rebuilding the link between cognition, behaviour, and psychology
Delivered by: not reported
Frequency: not reported
Treatment duration: 6 months
2. Standard care group: N = 56
Content: antipsychotics, psychoeducation, coping strategies, problem‐solving training
Delivered by: not reported
Frequency: not reported
Treatment duration: 6 months
Outcomes Quality of life: physical, role physical, role emotional (SF‐36 scores)
Satisfaction with treatment: leaving the study early
Unable to use:
The feeling of stigma ‐ not predefined outcome for this review
Notes *Participants in the CBT group also received the standard care intervention.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "...randomly assigned based on random number table..." (p.72).
Comment: adequate randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comments: The method of concealment was not described.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comments: The author did not address this information. However, participants and personnel were not likely to be blinded because participants in the treatment group received CBT, and the control group only received standard care.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comments: The method of blindness was not described.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Comments: 9 participants and 14 participants were lost to follow‐up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comments: All measured outcomes were reported.
Other bias Low risk Comments: none obvious