Skip to main content
. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD009201. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009201.pub2

NCT00341354 2007.

Methods Unicentre, randomized, controlled study
Participants Setting: San Gerardo Hospital in Milan, Italy
 Inclusion criteria: Adults at least 18 years old eligible for enrolment if they were expected to require mechanical ventilation with an endotracheal tube with an internal diameter of 7.5 mm or 8.0 mm for 48 hours or longer
 Exclusion criteria: Males and females less than 18 years old; patients who are expected to be intubated for less than 48 hours; patients who are allergic to silver‐sulfadiazine; patients who require an endotracheal tube with an internal diameter less than 7.5 mm or greater than 8.0 mm; patients who do not tolerate disconnection from the ventilator; haemodynamically unstable; severe ARDS: PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 200 at PEEP ≤ 5 cmH20
 Participant numbers: not mentioned
Interventions Silver‐sulfadiazine tracheal tubes/mucus shaver in intubated patients expected to have a prolonged mechanical ventilation
Outcomes No outcome data were available
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No outcome data were available to judge this bias
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No outcome data were available to judge this bias
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No outcome data were available to judge this bias
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No outcome data were available to judge this bias
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No outcome data were available to judge this bias
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No outcome data were available to judge this bias
Other bias High risk Possible publication bias