Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;2016(5):CD009491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009491.pub2

Coll‐Vinent 2003.

Methods Single‐centre parallel‐group randomized controlled trial conducted in Spain
Participants 32 consecutive adults undergoing cardioversion for supraventricular arrhythmia in an emergency department
Interventions Randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms (all intravenous administration):
1) 0.2 mg/kg midazolam
2) 0.2 mg/kg etomidate
3) 1.5 mg/kg propofol
4) 0.2 mg/kg midazolam and flumazenil 0.5 mg bolus followed by 0.5 mg infusion for 1 hour
If induction was not achieved within 3 ‐ 5 minutes, supplementary doses of etomidate (0.05 mg/kg), midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) or propofol (0.5 mg/kg) were injected at 1‐minute intervals until the desired effect was obtained
Outcomes Measured during the procedure:
Level of sedation using a sedation assessment scale (Ramsay scale)
Vital signs (systolic blood pressure after sedation)
Vital signs (desaturation < 90%)
Duration of sedation
Onset of sedation
Measured after the procedure:
Offset time of sedation
Notes Only median values reported for continuous outcomes (skewed distributions because of small sample size). We did not include the midazolam and flumazenil group in our review because combinations of medications with midazolam were excluded.
 The authors declared that no outside funding or support was received for the study. No other conflicts of interest were reported.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random‐number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not blinded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No withdrawals
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No clear evidence that measured outcomes were not reported (trial protocols were not sought for confirmation)
Other bias Low risk None expected