Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;2016(5):CD009491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009491.pub2

D'Agostino 2000.

Methods Single‐centre parallel‐group randomized controlled trial conducted in USA
Participants 40 2‐months – 8‐year‐old children requiring neuroimaging with sedation. Average age 31 ± 23 months and 45% were boys.
Interventions Oral midazolam 0.5 mg/kg (max 10 mg) vs oral chloral hydrate 75 mg/kg (max 2 g)
Could received additional dose (50% of original dose) if required
Outcomes Measured during the procedure:
 1) Numerical rating of anxiety
2) Duration of sedation
3) Incomplete procedures
Notes Conflicts of interest or funding sources were not reported
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random‐number table
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Children were administered freshly‐prepared, identically‐appearing, cherry‐flavoured liquids in body weight equivalent volumes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Neither the participant nor any of the investigators were aware of the active component given to individual participants
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reasons for withdrawals were reported. Randomized children who did not complete the protocol included 1 with respiratory distress, 1 who ate a full meal prior to intended drug administration, 1 who fell asleep after intravenous line placement and 4 who cancelled their appointments after randomization
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No clear evidence that measured outcomes were not reported (trial protocols were not sought for confirmation)
Other bias Low risk None expected