Kim 2003.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement, stratified for diabetes mellitus |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Open‐label, however unlikely to have influenced the objective outcome measured |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Dropout rates ‐ 38/64 (59%). Missing participants not accounted for. Per protocol analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No report of peritonitis or survival |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |