MIDAS 1994.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "telephone from a single office (Innovata Biomed) at the first visit" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "telephone from a single office (Innovata Biomed) at the first visit" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Although mod‐high dropout rate (71/209 (34%)), all missing participants are accounted for and reasonably balanced in terms of cause |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | RRF not reported |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |