Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 26;2018(10):CD007554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007554.pub3

Yoo 2015.

Methods
  • Study design: RCT

  • Study duration: not reported

  • Follow‐up period: 12 months

Participants
  • Country: Republic of Korea

  • Setting: single centre

  • Prevalent CAPD patients

  • Number: treatment group (75); control group (39)

  • Mean age ± SD (years): treatment group (50.9 ± 11.5); control group (50.7 ± 13.2)

  • Sex (M/F): treatment group (34/41); control group (16/23)

  • Exclusion criteria: not reported

Interventions Treatment group
  • Neutral pH, low GDP PD solution (Physioneal solution)


Control group
  • Conventional PD solution (Dianeal solution)

Outcomes
  • Biochemical maker ( CA‐125, IL‐6)

  • Peritoneal UF

  • 4‐hour dialysate:plasma creatinine

  • Solute clearance

  • Peritonitis rate

Notes
  • Funding source: not reported

Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated random number
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Open‐label, unlikely to affect outcomes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 15.5% dropout
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Limited outcomes are reported
Other bias Unclear risk Insufficient information to permit judgement