Summary of findings for the main comparison. Low protein diet versus normal protein diet for non‐diabetic adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
Low protein diet versus normal protein diet for non‐diabetic adults with CKD | |||||
Patient or population: non‐diabetic adults with CKD Setting: all settings Intervention: low protein diet Comparison: normal protein diet | |||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | No. of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | |
Risk with normal protein diet | Risk with low protein diet | ||||
Death (all causes) | 55 per 1,000 | 42 per 1,000 (28 to 65) | RR 0.77 (0.51 to 1.18) | 1680 (5) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 1 |
ESKD | 144 per 1,000 | 151 per 1,000 (105 to 220) | RR 1.05 (0.73 to 1.53) | 1814 (6) | ⊕⊕⊝⊝ LOW 1 2 |
End or change in GFR | The SMD for end or change in GFR was 0.18 lower (0.75 lower to 0.38 higher) with low protein diet compared to normal protein diet | ‐ | 1680 (8) | ⊕⊝⊝⊝ VERY LOW 1 2 3 | |
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio; ESKD: end‐stage kidney disease; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; SMD ‐ standardised mean difference | |||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1 The confidence intervals include potential for important benefits and harms
2 Important and unexplained heterogeneity present
3 The outcome reported is a surrogate outcome