Anonymous Study 1 1990.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Low protein diet group
Normal protein diet group
Co‐interventions
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Block randomisation scheme for each centre |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed and numbered envelopes |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded and lack of blinding may influence patient management |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): End or change in GFR End of change in GFR | Unclear risk | No information provided. Outcome not reported in this study |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Need to start dialysis Need to start dialysis | Unclear risk | Unclear how endpoint of onset of ESKD and the need for dialysis was determined |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not clear whether data on all participants were reported |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No report of death or GFR; medians of BMI only available |
| Other bias | Low risk | Grant from Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, FRG (No. 0704743) |