Anonymous Study 2 1990.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Very low protein diet group
Low protein diet group
Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Block randomisation scheme for each centre |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Sealed and numbered envelopes |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded and lack of blinding may influence patient management |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): End or change in GFR End of change in GFR | Unclear risk | No information provided. Outcome not reported in this study |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Need to start dialysis Need to start dialysis | Unclear risk | Unclear how end point of the onset of ESKD and the need for dialysis was determined |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not clear whether data on all participants were reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | No report of death or GFR; medians of BMI only available |
Other bias | Low risk | Grant from Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie, FRG (No. 0704743) |