Ihle 1989.
| Methods |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Interventions | Very low protein diet group
Normal protein diet group
Both groups received 35 to 40 kcal/kg/d Co‐interventions
|
|
| Outcomes |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded and lack of blinding may influence patient management |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): End or change in GFR End of change in GFR | Low risk | Primary outcome was laboratory measurement of GFR by EDTA clearance and unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Need to start dialysis Need to start dialysis | High risk | Decision to commence dialysis depending on uraemic symptoms and/or SCr > 1300 µmol/L |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 8/72 (11%) excluded from analyses (3 withdrew; 5 excluded for non‐compliance with diet) |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Report on number reaching ESKD & GFR. Body weight only reported graphically. Deaths not reported but there appear to be no deaths |
| Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |