Ihle 1989.
Methods |
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Interventions | Very low protein diet group
Normal protein diet group
Both groups received 35 to 40 kcal/kg/d Co‐interventions
|
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Not blinded and lack of blinding may influence patient management |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): End or change in GFR End of change in GFR | Low risk | Primary outcome was laboratory measurement of GFR by EDTA clearance and unlikely to be influenced by lack of blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias): Need to start dialysis Need to start dialysis | High risk | Decision to commence dialysis depending on uraemic symptoms and/or SCr > 1300 µmol/L |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | 8/72 (11%) excluded from analyses (3 withdrew; 5 excluded for non‐compliance with diet) |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Report on number reaching ESKD & GFR. Body weight only reported graphically. Deaths not reported but there appear to be no deaths |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement |