Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 9;2018(11):CD006495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006495.pub5

Comparison 2. RT versus no RT: subgroup analyses for type of RT.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality 5 1537 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.37, 1.99]
1.1 Genotype 5 890 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.85 [0.33, 2.21]
1.2 Phenotype 2 647 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.86 [0.14, 5.35]
2 Virological failure 10 1601 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.68 [0.55, 0.85]
2.1 Genotype 8 1230 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.67 [0.52, 0.87]
2.2 Phenotype 3 371 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.72 [0.45, 1.17]