Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 9;2018(11):CD006495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006495.pub5

Comparison 3. RT versus no RT: subgroup analyses for expert advice.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality 5 1140 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.36, 2.22]
1.1 Expert advice 1 153 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.96 [0.06, 15.65]
1.2 No expert advice 4 987 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.88 [0.33, 2.32]
2 Virological failure 10 1728 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.70 [0.56, 0.87]
2.1 Expert advice 3 600 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.59 [0.41, 0.83]
2.2 No expert advice 7 1128 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.77 [0.57, 1.04]