Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 9;2018(11):CD006495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006495.pub5

Rubini 2002.

Methods A prospective randomized study in Brazil
Participants 49 participants
Inclusion criteria: children and adolescents previously exposed to at least 2 ART treatment regimens and to failing therapy
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Interventions Intervention: therapy switch was based on genotypic resistance testing (genotypic group; GG)
Control: therapy switch was based on the physician's clinical experience (control group; CG)
Outcomes Treatment success, change in viral load
Notes Consent procedures were not reported.
Funding was not reported.
This study was published as an abstract.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Method of randomization was not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information was provided.
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No information was provided.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No information was provided.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 10.2% were excluded for compliance or toxicity. Data were not reported by group.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Two key outcomes were reported.
Other bias Unclear risk We found no other sources of bias.
Overall risk assessment Unclear risk Risk is due to the uncertainties raised above.