Rubini 2002.
Methods | A prospective randomized study in Brazil | |
Participants | 49 participants Inclusion criteria: children and adolescents previously exposed to at least 2 ART treatment regimens and to failing therapy Exclusion criteria: not reported |
|
Interventions | Intervention: therapy switch was based on genotypic resistance testing (genotypic group; GG) Control: therapy switch was based on the physician's clinical experience (control group; CG) |
|
Outcomes | Treatment success, change in viral load | |
Notes | Consent procedures were not reported. Funding was not reported. This study was published as an abstract. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method of randomization was not reported. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No information was provided. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No information was provided. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | No information was provided. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 10.2% were excluded for compliance or toxicity. Data were not reported by group. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Two key outcomes were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | We found no other sources of bias. |
Overall risk assessment | Unclear risk | Risk is due to the uncertainties raised above. |