Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;2018(11):CD006135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006135.pub3

Guo 2015.

Methods Randomised trial
Participants 180 children with eczema, from 2 months to 3 years of age. No additional information provided on exact ratio of randomisation into 2 arms. Patients with other medical conditions excluded
Interventions Active: routine symptomatic treatment and combination of 4 living bacterium tablets (Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Enterococcus, and Bacilus cereus) taken orally at a dose of 1 tablet twice a day for 1 month
Control: routine symptomatic treatment
Routine symptomatic treatment: mild disease – calamine lotion and zinc oxide ointment, 3 times daily for 2 weeks
Severe disease – loratadine syrup, topical mometasone and topical mupirocin to stop after disease control
All participants advised to avoid washing with hot water/spa products and scratching, and to look for potential allergens and avoidance advice
Outcomes IL‐4, IL‐10, IgE, IFN‐γ, and Th1:Th2 ratio
Relapse rate of the 2 groups in the 3‐month follow‐up visit. Relapse is defined as recurrence of rash within the 3 months
Eczema improvement:
• Complete resolution: ‐ complete clearance of rash and itch; and normal eating and sleeping patterns
• Good response: > 70% eczema clearance, no obvious lichenification, almost complete resolution of itch/intermittent itch, eating and daily activities not affected
• Partial response: 30% to 70% clearance, symptom improvement
• No response: < 30% rash clearance, no obvious reduction in itch
Complete resolution, good response, and partial response make up total percentage of responding participants
Notes Contact: guoyangjie829@163.com
Trial was conducted in a secondary care setting at a paediatric clinic
No information provided on sponsorship/conflicts of interest
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Inadequate information for a judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Inadequate information for a judgement
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information for a judgement
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information for a judgement
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Inadequate information for a judgement
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk All outcomes reported; however dose of probiotics not given, and results reported only narratively
Other bias Unclear risk No information on trial registration and sponsorship