Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 21;2018(11):CD006135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006135.pub3

Kirjavainen 2003.

Methods Parallel‐group randomised controlled trial. Intended duration of treatment not clear
Participants Twenty‐seven infants (mean age 5.5 months) with eczema and suspected cow's milk allergy. Method for diagnosing eczema not described
Setting: hospital paediatric department in Finland
Unclear how many participants lost to follow‐up
Participants randomised 2:1, probiotic:control
Interventions Lactobacillus GG at 3 × 10¹º CFUs/kg/d, mixed with extensively hydrolysed whey formula, or the same formula without probiotic. A third treatment arm (excluded from this review) used heat‐inactivatedLGG at 3 × 10¹º CFUs/kg/d, mixed with extensively hydrolysed whey formula
Outcomes SCORAD*
*Denotes outcomes prespecified for this review
Notes Study terminated early due to adverse effects in a third treatment arm. Third treatment arm not included in this systematic review because it involved the use of killed bacteria
Study funded by the Academy of Finland
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "These infants were randomly assigned into placebo, viable LGG..."
Comment: inadequate information for a judgement on risk of bias
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No information reported. Inadequate information for a judgement on risk of bias
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "These infants were randomly assigned into placebo, viable LGG or heat‐inactivated LGG groups and accordingly given in a double blind manner..."
Comment: inadequate information for a judgement on risk of bias
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Quote: "These infants were randomly assigned into placebo, viable LGG or heat‐inactivated LGG groups and accordingly given in a double blind manner..."
Comment: inadequate information for a judgement on risk of bias
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No data given on losses to follow‐up. Inadequate information for a judgement on risk of bias
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No evidence of selective reporting
Other bias Low risk No other bias found