Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 14;2018(11):CD009115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009115.pub3

2. Effect sizes for random‐effects and fixed‐effect analyses, and heterogeneity for random‐effects analyses.

 
Outcome
 
N°of studies
 
N°of participants
Random‐effects model Heterogeneity Fixed‐effect model
SMD (95% CI) Z P Chi2 P I2 (%) SMD (95% CI) Z P
Mixed/regular word reading accuracy 11 701 0.51 (0.13 to 0.90) 2.59 0.01 52.11 < 0.001 81 0.48 (0.32 to 0.64) 5.78 < 0.001
Non‐word reading accuracy 10 682 0.67 (0.26 to 1.07) 3.24 0.001 50.72 < 0.001 82 0.68 (0.51 to 0.84) 8.03 < 0.001
Irregular word reading accuracy 4 294 0.84 (0.30 to 1.39) 3.04 0.002 14.41 0.002 79 0.82 (0.58 to 1.07) 6.66 0.002
Mixed/regular word reading fluency 4 224 0.45 (–0.19 to 0.72) 3.33 < 0.001 2.20 0.53 0 0.45 (0.19 to 0.72) 3.33 < 0.001
Non‐word reading fluency 3 188 0.39 (0.10 to 0.68) 2.63 0.009 0.02 0.99 0 0.39 (0.10 to 0.68) 2.63 0.009
Reading comprehension 5 343 0.28 (–0.07 to 0.62) 1.54 0.12 8.45 0.08 53 0.23 (0.01 to 0.45) 2.07 0.040
Spelling 3 158 0.47 (–0.07 to 1.01) 1.72 0.09 3.89 0.14 49 0.28 (–0.09 to 0.65) 1.49 0.14
Letter‐sound knowledge 3 192 0.35 (0.04 to 0.65) 2.22 0.03 0.11 0.95 0 0.35 (0.04 to 0.65) 2.22 0.03
Phonological output 4 280 0.38 (–0.04 to 0.80) 1.77 0.08 7.97 0.05 62 0.44 (0.19 to 0.70) 3.45 < 0.001

CI: confidence interval; SMD: standardised mean difference.