Comparison 4. Phonics training versus control: sensitivity analysis with Hurford 1994 removed (random‐effects model).

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Mixed/regular word reading accuracy	10	651	Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.52 [0.09, 0.95]
2 Non‐word reading accuracy	9	632	Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI)	0.69 [0.24, 1.14]