Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;2018(10):CD007161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3

2. Summary of meta‐analyses.

Comparison Studies Outcome Statistical method Effect size Chi2 P value (Q) I2 (%)
ADMG + CAF versus SCTG + CAF Barros 2015; Joly 2007; Paolantonio 2002b; Shori 2013 GR depth change MD 95% CI ‐0.36 (‐1.03, 0.30) 15.06 0.002 80.0
CAL change MD 95% CI ‐0.53 (‐1.14, 0.08) 9.73 0.02 69.0
KT width change MD 95% CI ‐0.59 (‐1.27, 0.10) 17.17 0.0007 83.0
SCRC OR 95% CI 0.43 (0.13, 1.37) 0.00 0.96 0
ADMG + CAF versus CAF de Queiroz 2006; Woodyard 2004 GR depth change MD 95% CI 0.61 (‐0.52, 1.73) 7.45 0.006 87.0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.51 (‐0.25, 1.27) 2.32 0.13 57.0
KT width change MD 95% CI 0.28 (‐0.08, 0.64) 0.30 0.59 0
SCRC OR 95% CI 3.97 (0.20, 80.50) 5.03 0.02 80.0
EMP + CAF versus CAF (1) Del Pizzo 2005; Sangiorgio 2017; Spahr 2005 GR depth change MD 95% CI 0.07 (‐0.25, 0.40) 5.62 0.06 64.0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.22 (‐0.02, 0.45) 1.57 0.46 0
KT width change MD 95% CI 0.35 (0.13, 0.56) 0.64 0.73 0
EMP + CAF versus CAF (2) Del Pizzo 2005; Sangiorgio 2017; Spahr 2005 GR depth change MD 95% CI 0.32 (0.10, 0.55) 2.10 0.35 5.0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.35 (0.09, 0.61) 1.25 0.53 0
KT width change MD 95% CI 0.40 (0.17, 0.62) 1.63 0.44 0
EMP + CAF versus SCTG + CAF Abolfazli 2009; McGuire 2012 GR depth change MD 95% CI ‐0.39 (‐1.27, 0.48) 25.79 <0.00001 96.0
CAL change MD 95% CI ‐0.25 (‐0.69, 0.20) 2.95 0.09 66.0
KT width change MD 95% CI ‐1.06 (‐1.36, ‐0.76) 2.47 0.12 59.0
SCRC OR 95% CI 0.61 (0.05, 7.86) 7.86 0.005 87.0
GTR rm + CAF versus SCTG + CAF Paolantonio 2002; Wang 2001; Zucchelli 1998 GR depth change MD 95% CI ‐0.37 (‐0.60, ‐0.13) 0.25 0.88 0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.35 (0.06, 0.63) 0.93 0.63 0
KT width change MD 95% CI ‐1.77 (‐2.66, ‐0.89) 15.84 0.0004 87.0
SCRC OR 95% CI 0.61 (0.30, 1.24) 2.01 0.37 0
GTR rm + CAF versus GTR nrm + CAF Roccuzzo 1996; Zucchelli 1998 GR depth change MD 95% CI 0.23 (‐0.22, 0.68) 1.59 0.21 37.0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.12 (‐0.37, 0.60) 0.28 0.60 0
KT width change MD 95% CI 0.12 (‐0.23, 0.48) 0.03 0.86 0
SCRC OR 95% CI 1.33 (0.46, 3.85) 0.21 0.65 0
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF versus SCTG + CAF Paolantonio 2002; Rosetti 2000 GR depth change MD 95% CI ‐0.82 (‐2.13, 0.49) 9.92 0.002 90.0
CAL change MD 95% CI ‐0.52 (‐1.34, 0.30) 2.72 0.10 63.0
KT width change MD 95% CI ‐2.38 (‐2.84, ‐1.92) 1.86 0.17 46.0
GTR rm associated with bone substitutes + CAF versus GTR rm + CAF Dodge 2000; Paolantonio 2002 GR depth change MD 95% CI 0.48 (0.09, 0.88) 0.10 0.76 0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.76 (‐0.01, 1.54) 2.83 0.09 65.0
KT width change MD 95% CI 0.23 (‐0.21, 0.68) 1.63 0.20 39.0
SCRC OR 95% CI 1.87 (0.75, 4.64) 0.03 0.87 0
XCM + CAF versus CAF Jepsen 2013; Sangiorgio 2017 GR depth change MD 95% CI 0.40 (0.11, 0.68) 0.86 0.35 0
CAL change MD 95% CI 0.37 (‐0.09, 0.83) 1.70 0.19 41.0
KT width change MD 95% CI 0.44 (0.04, 0.85) 1.16 0.28 14.0
SCRC OR 95% CI 4.73 (2.35, 9.50) 0.16 0.69 0
PRF + CAF versus SCTG + CAF Tunali 2015; Öncü 2017 GR depth change MD 95% CI ‐0.01 (‐0.89, 0.86) 14.71 0.0001 93.0
CAL change MD 95% CI ‐0.37 (‐0.69, ‐0.06) 0.58 0.45 0
KT width change MD 95% CI ‐0.26 (‐0.98, 0.45) 13.41 0.0003 93.0

ADMG: acellular dermal matrix graft; CAF: coronally advanced flap; CAL: clinical attachment level; CI: confidence interval; EMP: enamel matrix protein; GR: gingival recession; GTR rm: guided tissue regeneration resorbable membrane; GTR nrm: guided tissue regeneration non‐resorbable membrane; KT: keratinized tissue; MD: mean difference; OR: odds ratio; PRF: platelet‐rich fibrin; RR: risk ratio; SCRC: sites with complete root coverage; SCTG: subepithelial connective tissue graft; XCM: xenogeneic collagen matrix.