Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;2018(10):CD007161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3

Comparison 9. GTR rm + bone substitutes + CAF versus GTR rm + CAF ‐ short term.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Gingival recession depth change 2 54 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.48 [0.09, 0.88]
2 Clinical attachment level change 2 54 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.76 [‐0.01, 1.54]
3 Keratinized tissue width change 2 54 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.23 [‐0.21, 0.68]
4 Sites with complete root coverage 2 54 Odds Ratio (Random, 95% CI) 1.87 [0.75, 4.64]