Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;2018(10):CD007161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3

Comparison 11. PRF + CAF versus SCTG +CAF ‐ short term.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Gingival recession depth change 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.01 [‐0.89, 0.86]
1.1 Split‐mouth design 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.01 [‐0.89, 0.86]
2 Clinical attachment level change 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.37 [‐0.69, ‐0.06]
2.1 Split‐mouth design 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.37 [‐0.69, ‐0.06]
3 Keratinized tissue width change 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.26 [‐0.98, 0.45]
3.1 Split‐mouth design 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.26 [‐0.98, 0.45]