Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;2018(10):CD007161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3

Keceli 2015.

Methods RCT, parallel design, 2 treatment groups, 6 months' duration
Participants 40 individuals, 27 females, aged 22 to 50 years, with 1 Miller Class I or II buccal gingival recession of at least 3 mm
Interventions 1. SCTG + platelet‐rich fibrin + CAF
2. SCTG + CAF
Outcomes GRC
CALC
KTC
SCRC
PCRC
MRC*(1)
(Manual probe)
Notes University/hospital‐based
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer generated randomisation list
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Number‐labeled opaque envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Patients were not blinded to the root coverage procedure
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All measurements were performed by 1 examiner not aware of the type of surgical procedure
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients completed the follow‐up period
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Evidence of selective reporting of outcomes was not detected
Other bias Low risk Evidence of other bias was not detected