Leknes 2005.
Methods | RCT, split‐mouth design, 2 treatment groups, 72 months' duration | |
Participants | 20 individuals, 10 females, mean age 38.4 years, with 2 Miller Class I or II buccal gingival recessions of at least 3 mm. 11 individuals completed the study | |
Interventions | 1. GTR (polylactic acid membrane ‐ Guidor) 2. CAF |
|
Outcomes | GRC CALC KTC SCRC PCRC MRC (Automated controlled force probe and manual probe) |
|
Notes | University/hospital‐based and membranes provided by Guidor AB Unpublished data were included following contact with author Data from earlier article (Amarante 2000) were reported as part of this trial |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Coin toss |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Information not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All measurements were performed by 1 examiner not aware of the type of surgical procedure |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 11 out of 20 subjects were available for the final evaluation (6 subjects rejected to complete the study and 3 moved to other part of Norway) Data are equally missing in both intervention groups (split‐mouth design), but reasons for these are both reported and balanced across groups, then important bias is not expected |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Evidence of selective reporting of outcomes was not detected |
Other bias | Low risk | Evidence of other was not detected |