Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 2;2018(10):CD007161. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007161.pub3

Shori 2013.

Methods RCT, parallel design, 2 treatment groups, 6 months' duration
Participants 20 individuals, aged 18 to 50 years, with 1 Miller Class I or II buccal gingival recessions of at least 3 mm
Interventions 1. ADMG + CAF
2. SCTG + CAF
Outcomes GRC
CALC
KTC*(2)
SCR
PCRC
MRC
(Automated controlled force probe)
Notes Universite/hospital‐based
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Coin toss
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Method not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Information not reported
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Information not reported
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk All patients completed the follow‐up period
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Evidence of selective reporting of outcomes was not detected
Other bias Low risk Evidence of other bias was not detected