Tozum 2005.
Methods | RCT, parallel design, 2 treatment groups, 6 months' duration | |
Participants | 31 individuals, 21 females, aged 16 to 59 years, with 1 Miller Class I or II buccal gingival recession of at least 3 mm | |
Interventions | 1. SCTG + modified tunnel procedure 2. SCTG + CAF |
|
Outcomes | GRC*(1) CALC*(1) MRC (Manual probe) |
|
Notes | University/hospital‐based Unpublished data were included following contact with author |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Coin toss |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Method not reported |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Information not reported |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | All measurements were performed by 1 examiner aware of the type of surgical procedure |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All patients completed the follow‐up period |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Evidence of selective reporting of outcomes was not detected |
Other bias | Low risk | Evidence of other bias was not detected |