Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 13;2018(11):CD010559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010559.pub2

Comparison 2. Moxibustion treatment vs sham moxibustion.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Karnofsky score 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 10.86 [5.10, 16.62]
2 QoL (EORTC QLQ‐C30) (version 3.0) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 14.88 [4.83, 24.93]
3 Nausea/vomiting (EORTC QLQ‐C30) (version 3.0) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐38.57 [‐48.67, ‐28.47]
4 Diarrhoea (EORTC QLQ‐C30) (version 3.0) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐13.81 [‐27.52, ‐0.10]
5 WBC count (× 109/L) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 1.72 [0.97, 2.47]
6 Haemoglobin (g/L) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.06 [1.26, 2.86]
7 Platelets (× 109/L) 1 50 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 210.79 [167.02, 254.56]