Zhang 2016b.
Methods | Design: parallel RCT Randomisation method: not reported Blinding: no Power calculation: no Dropouts/withdrawals: no |
|
Participants | The patients with original non‐small cell lung cancer (stage IIIa, IIIb and IV) with expected survival time of > 3 months, Karnofsky > 60 Number (treatment/control): 60 (30/30) Mean age (range): 57.22 (42‐70) Gender (M/F): 31/29 Country: Guangdong province, China Setting: hospital |
|
Interventions | Direct moxa cone + conventional medicine vs conventional medicine Treatment group
Control group
|
|
Outcomes | FACT‐L, Karnofsky score, nausea/vomiting (WHO grade 3 to 4) at the end of treatment | |
Notes | — | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No relevant description |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | There was no loss to follow‐up. All participants were included in the analysis. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Limited outcome measures were reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | It was mentioned that the groups were comparable, but no baseline characteristics data were presented. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Subjective outcomes | High risk | No blinding |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) Objective outcomes | Unclear risk | No objective outcome was reported. |