Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 18;2018(12):CD006202. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006202.pub2

Pohjola 2002.

Methods Title: sensitivity and tooth whitening agents
Trial design: randomised controlled trial
Location: Medical College of Georgia
Language: English
Number of centres: 1
Recruitment period: not reported
Funding source: not reported
Participants Participants: 18 years old and above
Total number: 12
Inclusion criteria: no medical condition; minimal gingival inflammation; no previous history of vital bleaching; A3 shade or above
Exclusion criteria: active caries
Number randomised: 12
Method of randomisation: not reported
Method of allocation concealment: not reported
Method of blinding: not reported
Number evaluated: not reported
Interventions Total number of intervention groups: 3
3 brands of commercial product with 10% carbamide peroxide
Rembrandt Xtra comfort
Nite White Excel
Fx product
Duration of treatment: 2 weeks
Outcomes Improvement in tooth shade
Vita shade guide
Notes Sample size calculation: not reported
Adverse effects: sensitivity and gingival irritation
Key conclusions of the study authors: "There was no significant difference between the products with respect to improvement in tooth whitening. All 3 products produced sensitivity. Thermal sensitivity was less with Rembrandt Xtra comfort and Nite White Excel"
Correspondence required: yes: missing data, P‐value not reported. Authors have been contacted
Contact: Dr Randall M Pohjola, rpobjola2mail.mcg.edu