Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;2018(12):CD012624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012624.pub2

Pozos‐Guillen 2007.

Methods Study design: parallel‐group randomized controlled trial
Sample size: 60
Country: Mexico
Setting: secondary care hospital
Dates conducted: not reported
Postoperative opioid used and delivery: N/A
Pain score collection: in clinic‐submitted pain evaluations
Concurrent postoperative analgesics: dexamethasone 4 mg intramuscular before procedure, paracetamol 500 mg to 1000 mg or ketorolac 10 mg (or intramuscular 30 mg) depending on pain
Participants Inclusion criteria
  1. Between the ages of 19 and 27 years

  2. Undergoing elective removal of an impacted mandibular third molar surgery with local anaesthesia


Exclusion criteria
  1. Use of analgesics 12 hours before the treatment

  2. History of seizure disorders

  3. Pregnancy

  4. Lactation

Interventions Group A (20 participants): intramuscular tramadol 100 mg 1 hour before surgery
Group B (20 participants): intramuscular tramadol 100 mg after surgery
Group C (20 participants): saline placebo
Outcomes
  1. Postoperative pain (0‐to‐10‐centimetre VAS at 6 and 24 hours)

  2. Relief of pain (0‐to‐4 scale at 24 hours)

  3. Analgesic consumption (mg ketorolac and mg paracetamol at 24 hours)

Notes Funding: funded by Universidad Autónoma San Luis Potosí; C0‐FAI‐04‐3.4 and C04‐FAI‐10‐10.53
Declarations of interest: not reported
Authors contacted: we contacted authors for further information but received no response.
Other: extracted from graphs using computer software. Unclear what errors bars represent
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Unclear details. Quote: "participants were randomized"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk No mention
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No double‐dummy placebo
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk No double‐dummy placebo
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk It appears that all participants were followed up.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Adverse events not fully reported.
Other bias Low risk Similar groups and no industry funding. Quote: "demographic characteristics of the sample were similar between groups for age and gender"