Richmond 1993.
Methods | Study design: parallel‐group randomized controlled trial Sample size: 76 Country: UK Setting: secondary care hospital Dates conducted: not reported Postoperative opioid used and delivery: PCA morphine Pain score collection: not reported Concurrent postoperative analgesics: none reported |
|
Participants |
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
|
|
Interventions |
Group IV Pre (23 participants): intravenous morphine 10 mg administered at induction Group IV Post (21 participants): intravenous morphine 10 mg administered at peritoneal closure Also reports that saline placebo was used |
|
Outcomes |
|
|
Notes | Funding: author recipient of Bristol‐Myers Squibb research grant. Role in published study unclear Declarations of interest: as above Authors contacted: no Other: pain score data extracted from graph and standard deviations estimated. Study also included a further group who were administered intramuscular morphine but we did not include this group in review as different route of administration. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No mention. Quote: "patients were randomly allocated" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Performed by pharmacist. Quote: "were randomly allocated by a pharmacist" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Saline used as placebo. Pharmacy made up study medications blind. Quote: "the study was double blind" |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Reported as blinded. Quote: "the study was double blind" |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Number of participants who dropped out for the reasons listed and to which groups they belonged is unclear from text. 1 reason for dropout was severe nausea, which could bias outcome of morphine consumption. Quote: "16 were excluded ... or severe nausea" |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No protocol or trial registration |
Other bias | Low risk | Similar baseline characteristics. 1 of the investigators received industry funding, but it was unclear if the funding was specific to this study. Quote: "the groups were not statistically different" |