Skip to main content
. 2018 Dec 3;2018(12):CD012624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012624.pub2

Richmond 1993.

Methods Study design: parallel‐group randomized controlled trial
Sample size: 76
Country: UK
Setting: secondary care hospital
Dates conducted: not reported
Postoperative opioid used and delivery: PCA morphine
Pain score collection: not reported
Concurrent postoperative analgesics: none reported
Participants Inclusion criteria
  1. ASA 1 and 2

  2. Undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy


Exclusion criteria
  1. Chronic pain

  2. Regular intake of analgesics

  3. Psychiatric illness

Interventions Group IV Pre (23 participants): intravenous morphine 10 mg administered at induction
Group IV Post (21 participants): intravenous morphine 10 mg administered at peritoneal closure
Also reports that saline placebo was used
Outcomes
  1. Morphine consumption (mg at 24 hours)

  2. Pain sensitivity and postoperative pain (rest and movement on 0‐to‐100‐millimetre VAS at 4, 24, and 48 hours)

Notes Funding: author recipient of Bristol‐Myers Squibb research grant. Role in published study unclear
Declarations of interest: as above
Authors contacted: no
Other: pain score data extracted from graph and standard deviations estimated. Study also included a further group who were administered intramuscular morphine but we did not include this group in review as different route of administration.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No mention. Quote: "patients were randomly allocated"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Performed by pharmacist. Quote: "were randomly allocated by a pharmacist"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Saline used as placebo. Pharmacy made up study medications blind. Quote: "the study was double blind"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Reported as blinded. Quote: "the study was double blind"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Number of participants who dropped out for the reasons listed and to which groups they belonged is unclear from text. 1 reason for dropout was severe nausea, which could bias outcome of morphine consumption. Quote: "16 were excluded ... or severe nausea"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No protocol or trial registration
Other bias Low risk Similar baseline characteristics. 1 of the investigators received industry funding, but it was unclear if the funding was specific to this study. Quote: "the groups were not statistically different"