Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 20;2018(10):CD011537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011537.pub3

Mostajeran 2017.

Methods Design: 2‐arm parallel RCT
Participants Number: 100
Women's age: mean 31.3 ± 5.2 years
Inclusion criteria: women 20 to 40 years old with body mass index 18 to 30 kg/m² were eligible if they were infertile owing to male factor, had a regular menstrual cycle of 24 to 35 days, and were presumed to be ovulatory
Exclusion criteria: presence of polycystic ovary syndrome, with uterine pathologies, endometriosis, or presence of hydrosalpinges and any endocrine disease or chronic systemic illness; azoospermia; history of successful IVF or ICSI
Ovarian controlled hyperstimulation: not mentioned
Fertilisation: IVF and ICSI
Stage of the embryo at transfer: blastocyst
Embryo processing: frozen/thawed
 Number of embryos transferred: 1 to 3
Interventions Experimental (n = 50): injection of 700 IU of intrauterine hCG (chorionic gonadotropin human, Darou Pakhsh Company, Iran) 10 minutes before embryo transfer
Control (n = 50): did not receive hCG before embryo transfer
Outcomes Clinical pregnancy
Notes Location: Fertility and Infertility Center of Isfahan in Iran
Period: September 2013 to April 2014
Power calculation: yes, but inadequate
Funding: not mentioned
Trial registration: not mentioned
Publication type: full text
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Participants were randomly divided into two 50‑member groups by random allocation software.
 Saghaei, 2004
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not mentioned
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Embryo transfer in both groups was done by the attending gynaecologist, who was blinded to the study.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Not blinded, but unlikely to induce bias
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk 6 participants lost to follow‐up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk No data on miscarriage or live birth
Other bias Low risk Similar baseline characteristics between groups after randomisation