Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 6;2018(11):CD006349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006349.pub4

Sorensen 2005.

Methods Randomised controlled trial, open‐label
Participants N = 27
Inclusion criteria
  • New pain in spine (within 6 months)

  • X‐ray verified low energy spinal fracture(s)


Exclusion criteria
  • Less than 20% or more than 90% reduction of the vertebral height

  • Lack of pain at fracture level

  • No need for continuous analgesic treatment

  • Patient not able to communicate

  • General anaesthesia contraindicated

  • MRI not possible

  • Coagulopathy (not adjustable)

  • Spondylitis, disciitis or spinal metastasis

Interventions
  • Vertebroplasty

  • Usual care

Outcomes Follow‐up to 12 months
Primary outcome
  • Level of pain


Secondary outcomes
  • Need for analgesics,

  • Number of days at hospital

  • Level of ADL

Study name Percutaneous vertebroplasty versus conservative treatment of pain: a prospective, randomized controlled study of osteoporotic fractures in the spine
Starting date March 2004
Contact information Principal Investigator: Leif Sorensen
Notes Trial Registration: NCT00203554
Primary sponsor: University of Aarhus, Denmark
Completed January 2008, no results available