Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 30;2018(11):CD003177. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003177.pub4

8. Comparison of the results of LCn3 interventions in this review with Balk 2016 and Aung 2018a.

  Balk 2016 Aung 2018 This review
No. of people experiencing events RR (95% CI) No, of people experiencing events RR (95% CI) No. of people experiencing events RR (95% CI)
All‐cause mortality 8480 0.97 (0.92 to 1.03) Not assessed 8647 0.98 (0.93 to 1.03)
Cardiovascular deaths 3799 0.92 (0.82 to 1.02) Not assessed 4763 0.95 (0.87 to 1.03)
CVD events (MACCEs in Balk 2016) 8085 0.96 (0.91 to 1.02) 12001 0.97 (0.93 to 1.01) 15614 0.99 (0.94 to 1.04)
CHD deaths Not pooled 2695 0.93, (0.83 to 1.03) 1791 0.93 (0.79 to 1.09)
CHD events Not assessed 6273 0.96, (0.90 to 1.01) 5865 0.93 (0.88 to 0.97)
Stroke 1467 0.98 (0.88 to 1.09) 1713 1.03 (0.93 to 1.13) 1871 1.06 (0.96, 1.16)
Arrhythmia Not pooled Not assessed 3788 0.97 (0.90 to 1.05)

CHD: coronary heart disease; CI: confidence interval; CVD: cardiovascular disease; MACCE: major adverse cerebrovascular or cardiovascular event; RR: risk ratio.

aMeta‐analysis of effects of LCn3 in Balk 2016 and Aung 2018 systematic reviews, comparing their findings with our findings for our primary outcomes.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure