Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 13;16(8):1333. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081333

Table 3.

Quality assessment of four cohort studies using a modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.

Study Criteria of modified Newcastle–Ottawa Scale
Prior Criteria;
Representativeness
Ascertainment of Exposure Starting Condition Prior to Outcome Adjustment for Confounding Factors a Ascertainment of Outcome Sufficiency of Follow-Up Period Adequacy of Follow-Up
Hsiao 2010 [21] Lack of detailed description of selection criteria Medical records Chyloperitoneum was not pre sent Infection and other causes Standardised assessment No statement Complete follow-up
Yang 2008 [23] Lack of detailed description of selection criteria Medical records Chyloperitoneum was not present Infection and other causes Standardised assessment Follow-up period ≥ 30 d More than 90%
Topal 2006 [22] Unclear Medical records Chyloperitoneum was not present Infection Visual observation; Turbidity of peritoneal dialysate Not sufficient; 1 d Complete follow-up
Yoshimoto 1998 [11] Participant selection by researchers Medical records Chyloperitoneum was not present Infection and other causes Standardised assessment Not sufficient; 2 d Subsequent observation by a biochemical test was performed on 53% of the patients

a The factors except for infection were possible causes of chyloperitoneum, e.g., cancer, lymphatic obstruction, and traumatic abdominal injury. Abbreviation: d, day(s).