Skip to main content
. 2017 Jan 31;60(5):854–864. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4216-4

Table 3.

OR (95% CI) for IFBG per geographical location, using rural Ghana as reference

Model of adjustment Rural Ghana Urban Ghana Amsterdam Berlin London
Age + sex 1.00 1.41 (1.08, 1.84) 3.44 (2.69, 4.39) 1.00 (0.70, 1.45) 1.58 (1.20, 2.08)
Age + sex + HOMA-IR 1.00 0.96 (0.72, 1.27) 2.52 (1.94, 3.26) 0.83 (0.56, 1.22) 1.02 (0.78, 1.38)
Age + sex + inverse HOMA-B 1.00 1.49 (1.14, 1.95) 3.76 (2.93, 4.82) 1.13 (0.78, 1.64) 1.72 (1.30, 2.27)
Age + sex + HOMA-IR + inverse HOMA-B 1.00 1.06 (0.79, 1.44) 3.30 (2.51, 4.36) 1.27 (0.84, 1.91) 1.29 (0.94, 1.77)