TABLE 1.
Selection | Comparability | Outcome | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Study, year (ref) | Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the unexposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that the outcome of interest was not present at the start of the study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur? | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | Total |
Vercambre et al., 2009 (27) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | ******* | ||
Ozawa et al., 2014 (28) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | ******** | |
Lana et al., 2015 (12) | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | ******** |
Kesse-Guyot et al., 2016 (29) | * | * | ** | * | * | ****** | |||
Petruski-Ivleva et al., 2017 (30) | * | * | * | ** | * | * | ******* |
1NOS high-quality choices are identified with a star. A maximum of 1 star is applied for each item within the Selection and Outcome categories, and a maximum of 2 stars for Comparability. NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale; ref, reference.