Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 5;147:e173. doi: 10.1017/S095026881900061X

Table 4.

Cox proportional hazards model: baseline and time-varying network metrics as predictors of injecting frequency reduction

First reduction event (events = 218) Six-month sustained reduction (n = 43 events)
Level Adjusted HR (95% CI) P-valuea Adjusted HR (95% CI) P-valueb
Baseline network metric
Degrees Continuous 1.07 (1.01–1.14) 0.043 1.10 (0.95–1.27) 0.191
1 + degrees 0.95 (0.47–1.95) 0.898 1.50 (0.20–11.08) 0.688
Eccentricity Continuous 0.97 (0.91–1.02) 0.219 0.91 (0.80–1.04) 0.162
1+ 0.96 (0.56, 1.64) 0.877 0.89 (0.31, 2.51) 0.891
2+ 0.84 (0.62, 1.14) 0.268 0.70 (0.38, 1.31) 0.267
Closeness centrality Continuous 0.94 (0.85–1.05) 0.258 0.87 (0.69–1.10) 0.232
Betweenness centrality Continuous 1.00 (0.99–1.00) 0.635 1.00 (0.99–1.01) 0.936
Clustering coefficient Continuous 0.99 (0.59–1.68) 0.997 1.20 (0.40–3.56) 0.742
Eigenvector centrality Continuous 1.53 (0.72–3.25) 0.269 0.93 (0.14–6.37) 0.941
>0 1.47 (1.01–2.24) 0.041 1.85 (0.77–4.41) 0.168
Time-varying network metric
Degrees Continuous 1.10 (1.05–1.16) <0.001 1.14 (1.00–1.29) 0.048
1 + degrees 1.47 (0.85–2.54) 0.173 1.93 (0.48–7.81) 0.355
Eccentricity Continuous 1.21 (1.05–1.69) 0.001 1.25 (1.11–1.41) <0.001
1+ 2.41 (2.02, 2.86) <0.001 3.34 (2.27, 4.92) <0.001
2+ 1.21 (1.01, 1.44) 0.036 1.28 (0.87, 1.90) 0.211
Closeness centrality Continuous 0.89 (0.58–1.36) 0.591 1.19 (0.52–2.73) 0.683
Betweenness centrality Continuous 1.00 (0.98–1.02) 0.842 1.01 (0.97–1.06) 0.542
Clustering coefficient Continuous 1.06 (0.75–1.49) 0.733 1.06 (0.47–2.38) 0.882
Eigenvector centrality Continuous 1.28 (0.85–1.91) 0.240 0.79 (0.25–2.53) 0.693
>0 0.92 (0.71–1.20) 0.557 1.16 (0.72–1.85) 0.542
a

Each network metric modelled separately adjusted for sex, baseline injection frequency and interview density.

b

Each network metric modelled separately adjusted for age, sex, baseline injection frequency and interview density.