Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 8;60(3):432–441. doi: 10.1007/s00125-016-4165-3

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

ROC AUCs and corresponding 95% CIs of the oral DIs for: (a) discriminatory abilities for incident type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in at-baseline non-T2DM; (b) discriminatory abilities for incident T2DM in at-baseline NGM; and (c) discriminatory abilities for incident prediabetes in at-baseline NGM, CODAM study, Maastricht, the Netherlands, 1999–2009. Dashed line, ROC AUC 50%. *p < 0.05 for ROC AUC vs Matsuda index alone