Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 25;49(5):663–676. doi: 10.1111/cea.13335

Table 4.

Factors associated with IgE sensitization (ImmunoCAP IgE > 0.35 kU/L) to any of D pteronyssinus, A hypogaea or B germanica

Factor Urban Rural Interaction P
N (%)a aOR (95% CI)b, d P N (%)a aOR (95% CI)b, c P
Age 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) 0.547 1.01 (0.98, 1.03) 0.589 0.728
Sex
Male 47 (48) 1 241 (64) 1
Female 101 (41) 0.77 (0.51, 1.15) 0.200 196 (49) 0.69 (0.42, 1.14) 0.140 0.407
Younger siblings (Yes/No)
No 27 (33) 1 61 (62) 1
Yes 106 (46) 2.07 (1.07, 4.01) 0.030 313 (56) 0.76 (0.53, 1.09) 0.129 0.008
Occupation
Student or child (not at school) 68 (48) 1 64 (51) 1
Unemployed or housewife 34 (40) 0.70 (0.31, 1.60) 58 (54) 2.05 (1.38, 3.03)
Agricultural, fishing or lake related 4 (36) 0.56 (0.13, 2.46) 251 (61) 1.87 (1.04, 3.37)
Professional or service providers 27 (38) 0.61 (0.26, 1.43) 0.725 61 (47) 1.38 (0.72, 2.66) 0.014 0.148
Lake contact
Never 39 (45) 1
Rarely 69 (42) 0.98 (0.52, 1.85) 8 (42) 1
Once a month 11 (35) 0.74 (0.38, 1.41)
Once a week 14 (50) 1.32 (0.49, 3.55) 0.835 25 (44) 0.82 (0.23, 2.89)
Daily/almost daily 343 (59) 1.64 (0.45, 5.90) 0.174
Bathe in water from lake?
No 121 (42) 1 15 (63) 1
Yes 12 (57) 1.86 (0.50, 6.87) 0.331 361 (57) 0.42 (0.15, 1.11) 0.078 0.065
Hand washing after toilet
No 15 (39) 1 148 (71) 1
Yes 117 (43) 1.36 (0.69, 2.66) 0.344 228 (50) 0.43 (0.30, 0.61) <0.001 0.003
SWA‐specific IgEe 2.95 (0.51, 17.2) 0.214 6.17 (2.79, 13.6) <0.001 0.459
SWA‐specific IgG4e 1.01 (0.85, 1.19) 0.932 1.07 (0.89, 1.27) 0.470 0.433
SEA‐specific IgG4e 1.11 (0.97, 1.25) 0.102 1.07 (0.95, 1.21) 0.227 0.704
SWA‐specific IgGe 3.33 (1.12, 9.86) 0.031 1.53 (0.82, 2.86) 0.177 0.340
SEA‐specific IgGe 1.77 (0.63, 4.96) 0.260 1.43 (0.88, 2.30) 0.138 0.796
S mansoni infection (KK)
Uninfected 119 (44) 1 271 (55) 1
Infected 6 (43) 1.06 (0.34, 3.35) 0.910 118 (63) 1.52 (1.19, 1.94) 0.002 0.180
S mansoni infection intensity (KK)
Uninfected 119 (44) 1 271 (55) 1
Light 2 (29) 0.66 (0.11, 4.04) 54 (57) 1.74 (1.18, 2.54)
Moderate 2 (50) 1.20 (0.16, 8.79) 35 (66) 0.94 (0.46, 1.90)
Heavy 2 (67) 2.32 (0.13, 40.9) 0.662 29 (73) 2.37 (0.71, 7.83) 0.028 0.536
Any nematode infectionf
No 109 (42) 1 281 (54) 1
Yes 16 (62) 2.34 (0.76, 7.19) 0.130 108 (66) 1.53 (0.94, 2.49) 0.084 0.287
Slept under mosquito net last night?
No 35 (45) 1 203 (62) 1
Yes 97 (42) 0.93 (0.52, 1.66) 0.958 172 (52) 0.63 (0.41, 0.97) 0.037 0.316
Malaria treatment, last 12 mo
No 83 (45) 1 202 (63) 1
Yes 48 (39) 0.78 (0.46, 1.35) 0.365 221 (51) 0.52 (0.34, 0.81) 0.005 0.185

Associations shown in this table are from adjusted analyses. Full table with crude associations is shown in supplementary Table S1. This table shows only factors that were associated with IgE sensitization (before and/or after adjustment) in either the urban or the rural survey. All other factors that were assessed are listed in the statistical methods section. Significant associations are highlighted in bold. Interaction P values are shown to denote whether tests for interaction showed statistical evidence for urban‐rural differences in associations with IgE sensitization, or not.

aOR: adjusted odds ratios; KK: Kato‐Katz; SWA: Schistosoma adult worm antigen; SEA: Schistosoma egg antigen.

a

Number (percentage in parenthesis) of IgE sensitized individuals in each category.

b

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted for survey design.

c

All ORs were adjusted for hand washing after toilet use, mosquito net use, malaria treatment, age and sex.

d

All ORs were adjusted for age and sex.

e

Log10 (concentration+1) transformation applied before analysis.

f

Infection with any of Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura (assessed by KK), Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis (assessed by PCR).