Skip to main content
. 2019 May 10;11:4403–4412. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S202151

Table 2.

Cox’s proportional hazards regression model of overall survival for the 419 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in training set

Variable Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
HR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Age (years)
 ≥45 vs <45 2.656 (1.101–6.404) 0.030 2.454 (1.002–6.007) 0.049
Stage
 T2N0 1 0.043
 T1N1 vs T2N0 4.865 (0.621–38.109) 0.132
 T2N1 vs T2N0 9.650 (1.253–74.315) 0.030
N category
 N1 vs N0 3.318 (1.940–5.677) 0.035
Lymph node site
 Site 1 1 0.013
 Site 2 vs Site 1 4.455 (0.534–37.157) 0.167
 Site 3 vs Site 1 11.586 (1.541–87.111) 0.017
NLR group
 ≥2.80 vs <2.80 3.254 (1.421–7.451) 0.005 2.425 (1.024–5.739) 0.044
Fibrinogen (mg/mL)
 ≥3.30 vs <3.30 1.151 (1.008–1.314) 0.038
EBV DNA (copies/mL)
 ≥3000 vs <3000 2.896 (1.238–6.774) 0.014 2.434 (1.009–5.871) 0.048
Therapy
 RT vs CCRT 3.315 (1.487–7.388) 0.003 2.716 (1.168–6.317) 0.020

Notes: Lymph node site: lymph node location. Site 1= retropharyngeal lymph node, Site 2= unilateral cervical lymph node, Site 3= retropharyngeal and unilateral cervical lymph nodes.

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; NLR, Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio; RT, Radiotherapy; CCRT, Concurrent chemoradiotherapy.