Table 4.
Hierarchical regression analysis of variables predicting the performance of individuals with schizophrenia on the comprehension and production of sincere, deceitful, and ironic communicative acts on both the linguistic and extralinguistic scales: Model 1 (Attention, Speed processing, and General intelligence), Model 2 (WM, Planning, Cognitive flexibility and Inhibitory control), Model 3 (overall Theory of Mind).
DVs | IVs | R2 | R2Change | FChange | Sig. FChange |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linguistic comprehension | |||||
Standard | Model 1 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.200 | 0.658 |
Model 2 | 0.040 | 0.034 | 1.023 | 0.320 | |
Model 3 | 0.053 | 0.012 | 0.362 | 0.552 | |
Deceit | Model 1 | 0.007 | 0.007 | 0.204 | 0.655 |
Model 2 | 0.007 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.954 | |
Model 3 | 0.157 | 0.150 | 4.967 | 0.034 | |
Irony | Model 1 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.315 | 0.579 |
Model 2 | 0.126 | 0.115 | 3.831 | 0.060 | |
Model 3 | 0.132 | 0.006 | 0.184 | 0.671 | |
Linguistic production | |||||
Standard | Model 1 | 0.006 | 0.006 | 0.192 | 0.664 |
Model 2 | 0.076 | 0.070 | 2.197 | 0.149 | |
Model 3 | 0.282 | 0.206 | 8.044 | 0.008 | |
Deceit | Model 1 | 0.016 | 0.016 | 0.484 | 0.492 |
Model 2 | 0.050 | 0.034 | 1.034 | 0.318 | |
Model 3 | 0.189 | 0.139 | 4.801 | 0.037 | |
Irony | Model 1 | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.101 | 0.753 |
Model 2 | 0.005 | 0.001 | 0.038 | 0.847 | |
Model 3 | 0.045 | 0.040 | 1.171 | 0.288 | |
Extralinguistic comprehension | |||||
Standard | Model 1 | 0.102 | 0.102 | 3.418 | 0.074 |
Model 2 | 0.130 | 0.027 | 0.914 | 0.347 | |
Model 3 | 0.130 | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.925 | |
Deceit | Model 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.964 |
Model 2 | 0.009 | 0.009 | 0.257 | 0.616 | |
Model 3 | 0.061 | 0.052 | 1.554 | 0.223 | |
Irony | Model 1 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.228 | 0.636 |
Model 2 | 0.065 | 0.058 | 1.796 | 0.191 | |
Model 3 | 0.086 | 0.020 | 0.622 | 0.437 | |
Extralinguistic production | |||||
Standard | Model 1 | 0.036 | 0.036 | 1.110 | 0.300 |
Model 2 | 0.049 | 0.014 | 0.413 | 0.525 | |
Model 3 | 0.107 | 0.057 | 1.798 | 0.191 | |
Deceit | Model 1 | 0.005 | 0.005 | 0.137 | 0.714 |
Model 2 | 0.020 | 0.015 | 0.444 | 0.510 | |
Model 3 | 0.080 | 0.060 | 1.833 | 0.187 | |
Irony | Model 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.006 | 0.938 |
Model 2 | 0.022 | 0.022 | 0.639 | 0.431 | |
Model 3 | 0.022 | 0.000 | 0.007 | 0.934 | |
The table shows the adjusted regression coefficients (R2Adj) of each predictor variable, the change in R2 after the addition of the planning and theory of mind variables (R2Change), the change in F (FChange) and the significance value (Sig FChange). The level of significance for all statistical tests is < 0.005.