Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 14;126(3):383–392. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15286

Table 4.

Diagnostic accuracy of the clinical decision rules

Decision rule AUROC using full range of score values 95% CI Sensitivity at usual or recommended threshold 95% CI n/N Specificity at usual or recommended threshold 95% CI n/N
Primary consensus 0.626
0.572–0.681
0.609
0.532–0.683
103/169
0.585
0.523–0.646
151/258
Sensitive consensus 0.620
0.566–0.675
0.959
0.917–0.983
162/169
0.035
0.016–0.065
9/258
Specific consensus 0.589
0.537–0.642
0.361
0.289–0.438
61/169
0.783
0.728–0.832
202/258
PERC 0.621
0.570–0.672
0.675
0.598–0.745
114/169
0.519
0.457–0.582
134/258
Simplified Revised Geneva 0.579
0.526–0.632
0.444
0.368–0.522
75/169
0.636
0.574–0.694
164/258
Well's (permissive)a 0.577
0.522–0.632
0.490
0.410–0.571
77/157
0.617
0.553–0.678
153/248
Well's (strict)a 0.732
0.682–0.782
0.376
0.300–0.457
59/157
0.895
0.850–0.930
222/248
a

Well's criteria were tested using a liberal (permissive) interpretation of clinical diagnosis text to determine whether PE was the most likely or equal most likely diagnosis and a more strict interpretation.