Table 4.
Author | Year | Model Used | Carious strains | Probiotic Strains | Outcomes assessed | Methods used | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Schwendicke et al.[18] | 2017 | Biofilm | SM ATCC 25175 SM ATCC 20532 | Streptococcus (TH-4) | Zone of inhibition of SM Biofilm formation inhibition Enamel mineral loss Biofilm bacterial numbers |
Agar diffusion method Transverse microradiography Quantified on BHI agar |
Strong inhibitory effect on S. mutans growth Reduced SM numbers in biofilms than in monospecies Mineral loss by SM×LA-5 biofilms was higher than monospecies Bacterial numbers least in monospecies biofilm and highest in mixed species |
Walker et al.[15] | 2016 | Not mentioned | SM ATCC 25175 | S. salivarius JH | S. mutans inhibitory activity | Testing dextranase and BLIS activity | Increased anti-S. mutans activity |
Lee and Kim[19] | 2014 | Biofilm |
S. gordonii ATCC 10558 S. oralis ATCC 9811 S. sanguinis 804 S. mutans ATCC 25175 |
S. thermophilus | Antimicrobial activity Bacterial count Quantify changes in GTFS expression |
Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion Petroff-Hausser counting chamber RT-PCR | Lactobacillus strains formed wider bacteria free zones than S. thermophilus |
BHI: Brain-heart infusion, S. salivarius: Streptococcus salivarius, S. mutans: Streptococcus mutans, S. thermophiles: Streptococcus thermophiles, S. gordonii: Streptococcus gordonii, RT-PCR: Real-time polymerase chain reaction