Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar-Apr;22(2):123–128. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_505_18

Table 4.

The characteristics of in vitro studies included

Author Year Model Used Carious strains Probiotic Strains Outcomes assessed Methods used Results
Schwendicke et al.[18] 2017 Biofilm SM ATCC 25175 SM ATCC 20532 Streptococcus (TH-4) Zone of inhibition of SM
Biofilm formation inhibition
Enamel mineral loss
Biofilm bacterial numbers
Agar diffusion method
Transverse microradiography
Quantified on BHI agar
Strong inhibitory effect on S. mutans growth
Reduced SM numbers in biofilms than in monospecies
Mineral loss by SM×LA-5 biofilms was higher than monospecies
Bacterial numbers least in monospecies biofilm and highest in mixed species
Walker et al.[15] 2016 Not mentioned SM ATCC 25175 S. salivarius JH S. mutans inhibitory activity Testing dextranase and BLIS activity Increased anti-S. mutans activity
Lee and Kim[19] 2014 Biofilm S. gordonii ATCC 10558
S. oralis ATCC 9811
S. sanguinis 804
S. mutans ATCC 25175
S. thermophilus Antimicrobial activity
Bacterial count
Quantify changes in GTFS expression
Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion Petroff-Hausser counting chamber RT-PCR Lactobacillus strains formed wider bacteria free zones than S. thermophilus

BHI: Brain-heart infusion, S. salivarius: Streptococcus salivarius, S. mutans: Streptococcus mutans, S. thermophiles: Streptococcus thermophiles, S. gordonii: Streptococcus gordonii, RT-PCR: Real-time polymerase chain reaction