Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 29;14(Suppl 4):e12698. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12698

Table 3a.

Adjusted logistic regression results for predictors of EIBF and APF using latest available data

Variables EIBF among infants 0–23 monthsOR (95% CI) APF among infants 0–23 monthsOR (95% CI)
Afghanistan 2015 (n = 10,830) Bangladesh 2014 (n = 3,089) India 2015–2016 (n = 14,614) Nepal 2016 (n = 1,939) Pakistan 2012–2013 (n = 1,413) Afghanistan 2015 (n = 10,563) Bangladesh 2014 (n = 3,067) India 2015–2016 (n = 14,241) Nepal 2016 (n = 1,923) Pakistan 2012–2013 (n = 1,383)
Child variables
Birth size
Larger than average 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Average 0.87 (0.73–1.04) 0.96 (0.84–1.09) 0.82 (0.61–1.11) 0.96 (0.76–1.22) 0.76** (0.66‐0.89) 0.57* (0.33‐0.98)
Smaller than average 0.64** (0.51–0.80) 0.82* (0.69‐0.98) 0.67* (0.45‐1.00) 0.68* (0.51‐0.89) 0.54** (0.44‐0.66) 0.57 (0.30–1.10)
Postnatal check‐up
None 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
≤2 days 0.71** (0.59–0.86) 1.29* (1.03‐1.62) 1.17* (1.04‐1.32) 0.64 (0.41–1.00) 0.71* (0.55‐0.90) 0.69* (0.55‐0.85)
>2 days 0.96 (0.80–1.14) 1.16 (0.81–1.68) 1.26* (1.08‐1.49) 0.33* (0.17‐0.62) 0.61** (0.49‐0.75) 1.13 (0.73–1.74)
Maternal variables
ANC visit
0–3 1.00
4+ 1.63** (1.46‐1.82)
Birth attendant
Nonskilled others 1.00 1.00 1.00
Traditional birth attendant 0.52* (0.27‐0.98) 1.10 (0.77–1.58) 0.37* (0.20‐0.69)
Health professional 1.13 (0.72–1.76) 1.60* (1.18‐2.18) 1.20 (0.85–1.70)
Current employment
No 1.00
Yes 1.54* (1.15‐2.05)
Decision‐making autonomy
High 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Low 0.88* (0.80‐0.97) 0.67* (0.46‐0.96) 0.82* (0.68‐0.99) 0.83* (0.74‐0.94)
Delivery type
Not caesarean 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Cesarean 0.42** (0.27–0.68) 0.32** (0.23‐0.44) 0.53** (0.46‐0.60) 0.15** (0.10‐0.23) 0.40* (0.19‐0.81) 0.40** (0.29‐0.56) 0.49** (0.42‐0.57) 0.26** (0.17‐0.41)
Gender role attitudes
Nonconforming 1.00 1.00
Conforming 0.66* (0.46‐0.96) 0.77* (0.64‐0.94)
Maternal BMI
Normal 1.00
Underweight 0.70 (0.39–1.26)
Overweight 0.59* (0.40‐0.89)
Maternal education
No school 1.00 1.00 1.00
Primary 1.05 (0.89–1.24) 1.19 (0.99–1.43) 1.38 (0.87–2.18)
Secondary+ 1.19* (1.05‐1.35) 1.43** (1.23‐1.66) 1.71* (1.22‐2.41)
Place of delivery
Home 1.00 1.00 1.00
Health facility 0.76* (0.58–0.98) 1.41** (1.22‐1.63) 1.80* (1.18‐2.76)
Household variables
Caste
India
Otherwise backwards caste 1.00
Scheduled caste 1.21* (1.05‐1.39)
Scheduled tribe 2.25** (1.82‐2.79)
Other 1.09 (0.93–1.27)
Nepal
Relatively Advantaged 1.00 1.00
Relatively Disadvantaged 0.96 (0.71–1.30) 0.71 (0.50–1.00)
Disadvantaged 0.87 (0.60–1.26) 0.74 (0.52–1.17)
Other 0.69* (0.49‐0.98) 0.64* (0.45‐0.91)
Ethnicity
Afghanistan
Pashtun 1.00
Tajik 1.65** (1.26‐2.09)
Other 1.56** (1.21‐1.91)
Household size (members)
India
0–5 1.00 1.00
6–9 0.89* (0.80‐0.99) 0.84* (0.73‐0.96)
10+ 0.88 (0.77–1.01) 0.69** (0.59‐0.81)
Wealth quintile
Richest 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Richer 1.37* (1.12‐1.80) 1.24* (1.04‐1.47) 0.36* (0.19‐0.68) 1.25* (1.02‐1.55) 1.18 (0.79–1.77) 0.62* (0.38‐1.00)
Middle 1.32* (1.11‐1.77) 1.41** (1.16‐1.70) 0.66 (0.35–1.26) 1.19 (0.98–1.45) 1.26 (0.80–1.98) 0.64 (0.39–1.06)
Poorer 1.26* (1.08‐1.72) 1.42** (1.17‐1.73) 0.58 (0.31–1.10) 1.30* (1.06‐1.58) 1.95* (1.26‐3.01) 0.82 (0.49–1.39)
Poorest 1.31* (1.16‐1.88) 1.46* (1.17‐1.81) 1.11(0.54–2.31) 1.07 (0.86–1.33) 3.60** (2.04‐6.35) 1.57 (0.89–2.75)

Note. APF: avoidance of prelacteal feeding; BMI: body mass index; EIBF: early initiation of breastfeeding. Sample sizes are different because models differed by country and by outcome. Final models for EIBF included birth size, postnatal check‐up, place of delivery, delivery type, gender role attitudes, household size, wealth quintile, and ethnicity (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.520; Afghanistan); postnatal check‐up, place of delivery, and gender role attitudes (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.994; Bangladesh); birth size, postnatal check‐up, maternal education, ANC visit, place of delivery, delivery type, decision‐making autonomy, residence, household size, and wealth quintile, caste (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.703; India); birth size, place of delivery, delivery type, residence, wealth quintile, and caste (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.967; Nepal); and postnatal check‐up, maternal education, maternal BMI, delivery type, decision‐making autonomy, and wealth quintile (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.954; Pakistan). Final models for APF included birth size, postnatal check‐up, current employment, gender role attitudes, decision‐making autonomy, and ethnicity (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.879; Afghanistan); postnatal check‐up, place of delivery, delivery type, and residence (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.997; Bangladesh); birth size, maternal education, decision‐making autonomy, delivery type, household size, and caste (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.992; India); maternal age, maternal education, delivery type, household size, wealth quintile, and caste (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.797; Nepal); and birth size, maternal BMI, delivery type, household size, and wealth quintile (Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness‐of‐fit 0.548; Pakistan).

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.001.