Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 9;49(4):463–471. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14109

Table 1.

Advantages and disadvantages of the different cellular approaches for transplantation in Parkinson's disease (PD)

Fetal VM progenitors ES cells iPS cells Induced neurons
Advantages
  • Grafts can survive, integrate, re‐innervate the striatum and release dopamine

  • Promote functional recovery in pre‐clinical PD models

  • Proven efficacious in some patients

  • Unlimited availability of the cell product

  • Have the potential to form authentic DA progenitors that survive well, integrate, re‐innervate the striatum, release dopamine and mature after transplantation

  • Promote functional recovery in pre‐clinical PD models

  • Production can be standardized and cells cryopreserved and stored

  • GMP manufacturing protocols already established

  • Easy access of the cell source

  • Unlimited availability of the cell product

  • Have the potential to form authentic DA progenitors that survive well, integrate, re‐innervate the striatum, release dopamine and mature after transplantation

  • Promote functional recovery in pre‐clinical PD models

  • Production can be standardized and cells cryopreserved and stored

  • Possibility of autografting or to use banks for haplotype matching

  • Easy access of the cell source

  • Lower tumorogenic potential due to avoidance of pluripotent stage

  • Fast and efficient generation that makes the cells suitable to adapt for autologous grafting

Disadvantages
  • Very limited availability of the tissue

  • Variable results from clinical trials

  • Allografting that requires immunosuppression

  • Ethical issues

  • The graft may contain unwanted cell types

  • Risk of tumor formation after grafting if not properly differentiated

  • Allografting that requires immunosuppression

  • Ethical issues

  • The graft may contain unwanted cell types

  • Cells could migrate outside of the striatum

  • Risk of long‐term genetic instability

  • Risk of tumor formation after grafting if not properly differentiated

  • High costs

  • Additional risks associated with the reprogramming process

  • Variability in the cell products in the context of autologous grafting

  • The graft may contain unwanted cell types

  • Cells could migrate outside of the striatum

  • Risk of long‐term genetic instability

  • Current lack of study showing the long‐term survival, integration, re‐innervation of the striatum and the release of dopamine

  • Current lack of study showing a functional recovery in pre‐clinical PD models

  • High variability in cell product and thus more challenging to standardize

  • The graft may contain unwanted cell types

  • Risk of long‐term genetic instability