Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 13;81(4):2551–2565. doi: 10.1002/mrm.27594

Table 1.

T1 and T2 values for different ocular structures (annotated in Figure 1C), averaged within the structure and over 6 volunteersa

CS 3D MC Full 7T Richdale et al.
T1 (ms)
Lens nucleus 1403±178 1037±220 996±248 1520/1020
Vitreous body 3632±375 3614±444 3599±334 5000/4250
Orbital fat 93±23 100±29 95±26
Extraocular muscle 731±342 1736±346 1545±191
T2 (ms)
Lens nucleus 29±9 29±12 21±10
Vitreous body 139±14 147±20 145±12
Orbital fat 55±12 51±16 51±19
Extraocular muscle 67±26 50±12 55±25
a

Values, given in milliseconds, were averaged in different regions of interest (lens nucleus, vitreous body, orbital fat, and extraocular muscle) from the different scans at low resolution, using different reconstruction methods, for each of the 6 healthy volunteers. The resulting values were used to determine mean ± SD values over all volunteers. The CS reconstruction produced different relaxation times in small anatomical regions such as the lens nucleus and the extraocular muscles. The TRs for the MC‐based reconstructions are close to the values for the fully sampled scans. Remaining differences can be explained by motion artifacts that differ from scan to scan. Reference values at 7T (variable flip angle gradient echo/inversion recovery) from previous literature were reported in the last 2 columns, showing large differences in T1 values between different techniques.