Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Catal. 2018 Sep 27;8(11):10537–10544. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03507

Table 1.

Optimization of 4-Me-Anilide-Substituted Electrophile: Effect of Ligand

graphic file with name nihms-1023821-t0010.jpg
Entrya Pd(mol%) PR3(mol%) Yield[%]b E:Zc erd
1 PdXantphos G3 -- 40 2.3:1 96.4
2 Pd2dba3(5) Xantphos (10) 56 2.5:1 95.5
3 Pd2dba3(5) DPEphos (10) 40 3:1 96.4
4 Pd2dba3(5) dppf (10) 37 2.1:1 95.5
5 Pd2dba3(5) dppe (10) 26 1.9:1 96.4
6 Pd2dba3(5) PCy3 (20) 0 -- --
7 Pd2dba3(5) P(o-tolyl)3 (20) 0 -- --
8 Pd2dba3(5) P(4-OMePh)3 (20) 28 2.5:1 94.6
9 Pd2dba3(5) P(2-furyl)3 (20) 15 100:1 92.8
10 Pd2dba3(5) P(2-thienyl)3 (20) 43 6.6:1 96.4
11 Pd2dba3(5) P(2-thienyl)3 (10) 85 7.2:1 94.6
12 Pd2dba3 (10) P(2-thienyl)3 (25) 90 7.9:1 96.4
a

Reactions performed on a 0.1 mmol scale.

b

Yields determined by 1H NMR by comparison with an internal standard (1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene).

c

E/Z ratio calculated from crude 1H NMR.

d

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.