Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Catal. 2018 Sep 27;8(11):10537–10544. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.8b03507

Table 2.

Optimization of t-Butylketone-Substituted Electrophile: Effect of Ligand

graphic file with name nihms-1023821-t0011.jpg
Entrya Pd (mol%) PR3 (mol%) Yield [%]b E:Zc erd
1 PdXantphos G3 -- 45 E only 85:15
2 Pd2dba3(5) Xantphos (10) 41 E only --
3 Pd2dba3(5) DPEphos (10) 0 -- --
4 Pd2dba3(5) dppf (10) 36 E only -
5 Pd2dba3(5) dppe (10) 0 -- -
6 Pd2dba3(5) PCy3 (20) NA NA NA
7 Pd2dba3(5) P(o-tolyl)3 (20) NA NA NA
8 Pd2dba3(5) P(4-OMePh)3 (20) 0 -- -
9 Pd2dba3(5) P(2-furyl)3 (20) 50 E only -
10 Pd2dba3(5) P(2-thienyl)3 (20) 70 E only 86:14
11 Pd2dba3(5) P(2-thienyl)3(10) 70 E only 93:7
12 Pd2dba3 (10) P(2-thienyl)3 (25) 70 E only 93:7
13 Pd[P(2-thienyl)3]3 (5) -- 87 E only 96:4
a

Reactions performed on a 0.1 mmol scale.

b

Yields determined by 1H NMR by comparison with an internal standard (1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene).

c

E/Z ratio calculated from crude 1H NMR.

d

Determined by chiral HPLC analysis